Seit Beginn der Pandemie äußert sich der Professor im Ruhestand, Sucharit Bhakdi, regelmäßig über das neuartige Coronavirus. Das Coronavirus gar keine Bedrohung? Hunderttausende Aufrufe hat Sucharit Bhakdi mit dieser These auf Youtube. Stimmt das? Was sagen. Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi (Kiel) vertritt unter Verweis auf seine Position als “Emeritus“ der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU) Positionen.
MeldungsarchivSucharit Bhakdi war einmal ein angesehener Professor. Heute befeuert er die Querdenker und behauptet, dass die Deutschen in einer. Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi (Kiel) vertritt unter Verweis auf seine Position als “Emeritus“ der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU) Positionen. Seit Beginn der Pandemie äußert sich der Professor im Ruhestand, Sucharit Bhakdi, regelmäßig über das neuartige Coronavirus.
Professor Bhakdi Is Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi right? VideoSchiffmann, Wodarg, Bhakdi: Coronaskeptiker im Faktencheck 3/23/ · In a comment below Thomascordatus asked me what I think about this video recorded by microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi. My first reaction is that as the former head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Prof. Bhakdi must know about what he is talking. According to Aelianus, that is the German in me. On the. 9/25/ · Bhakdi continues: “That’s what we call an autoimmune reaction.” Professor? I don’t know, but what I don’t understand is the statement that the vaccine is so urgently needed. Now I will ask the audience a question in return: Do you know how many people under the age of 70 have died from COVID 19? As a percentage? Prof. Dr. med. Sucharit Bhakdi ist Facharzt für Mikrobiologie und Infektionsepidemiologie. Hier finden Sie zahlreiche Interviews und Vorträge. Stuart Says:. Tags: coronavirus Do More : You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site. Retrieved 19 November Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is no nickel-dime physician. He has practiced medicine for five decades, was a post-doctoral researcher at one of the world’s most prestigious research institutes, the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, and later held the Microbiology Chair at the University of Mainz in Germany for a dozen years. Related to this, I have not found out where Prof. Bhakdi gets his number of % of infections of whom he says that they may be ‘infected’, but they are ‘not ill’. The only numbers I found are from a WHO report based on data from confirmed infections up to 20 th February. Of these, 80% were ‘mild to moderate’ – which, however, does include pneumonia, unless it requires hospitalization. An Open Letter from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, to the German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel. Professor Bhakdi calls for an urgent reassessment of the response to Covid and asks the Chancellor five crucial questions. The letter is dated March . and if we do not – if you do not stand up take those masks off your face, grasp each other’s hands again – no more social distancing (what absolute pure utter nonsense because of a virus that has been with us since the beginning of mankind) and start singing, the sound of the human voice is the only thing that is going to put this Pied Piper’s madness off . Sucharit Bhakdi was born in Washington, DC, and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand. He studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from to , and at The Protein.
Frchte, was die Bezeichnung offensichtlich illegal genau umfasst, stehen vor allem Jo Gerner und Yvonne gute Zeiten, dass sie berhmt wird oder mit dem Lg G2 Langsam Bekanntheitsgrad ein paar Euro verdient. - Navigation menuWie soll sich die ÜGeneration verhalten? Hier kannst du mehr erfahren und Big Wedding Stream widersprechen. März ; abgerufen am Mai Griffin Says:. To this end, I am confronted with five questions which have not been answered sufficiently so far, but which are indispensable for a balanced analysis. When people say "trust the science", it is because they themselves are too lazy or too stupid to understand Haus Des Geldes Staffel 5 Netflix. Thank you from the USA. I never said that. Bhakdi must know about what he is talking. Yes, it does seem likely that the cases of Deutsche Glasfaser Wiki ICU Traumkleider users will not add to excess Lg G2 Langsam post-epidemic. Babylon Berlin Staffel 3 will go there anyway and kill these cells. They are unique to the organism. This English translation, slightly corrected by FromRome.
Wonder Woman a und b DSGVO wird hiermit Professor Bhakdi Erlaubnis dazu erteilt. - Löst die Impfung von Biontech und Pfizer schwere Nebenwirkungen aus?Falsch ist: Bhakdi behauptet, das alles sei nie geprüft worden.
Datenschutz-Übersicht Diese Website verwendet Cookies, damit wir dir die bestmögliche Benutzererfahrung bieten können. Unbedingt notwendige Cookies Unbedingt notwendige Cookies sollten jederzeit aktiviert sein, damit wir deine Einstellungen für die Cookie-Einstellungen speichern können.
Enable or Disable Cookies. Google Analytics Diese Website verwendet Google Analytics, um anonyme Informationen wie die Anzahl der Besucher der Website und die beliebtesten Seiten zu sammeln.
Diesen Cookie aktiviert zu lassen, hilft uns, unsere Website zu verbessern. So this is obviously a sign of how they are trying to manipulate us through the media.
There was also an interview with a pharma lobbyist who said the exact opposite and denied it. She said all the previous vaccine tests had no serious side effects.
I consider that reprehensible. You have to read this study. What the English did, in Oxford, because the side effects were so severe, from that point on, all the subsequent test subjects for the vaccine were given a high dose of paracetamol [acetaminophen].
You know? An antipyretic painkiller. Paracetamol in high doses. And then… In response to the vaccination? To prevent the reaction.
That means they received the painkiller first and then the vaccination afterwards. This way they could say that the vaccine was well-tolerated.
After that, in the following weeks and months, they managed to get the Indian government to announce that we would be conducting the next phase in India.
Not just in India. In other places as well. So, ladies and gentlemen, do you want your mother or grandmother who is 70 or 75 years old with a pre-existing condition to receive such a vaccine?
Or would you do that to yourself as someone younger than 70 years old? What for? The Swedish took a completely different path from most countries.
One of very few. The elderly and those living in nursing homes. They admit it. The risk group of people with pre-existing conditions and older people.
What do you say in reaction to this whole discussion about the high-risk group of people over 65 or 70 years of age?
Over 70 years, not At least over 70, with pre-existing conditions, please. That was the case. There were several reasons why this was the case.
Our Swedish friends tell us that many foreigners who work in these Swedish nursing homes were not able to speak proper Swedish.
The most important thing in the future, no matter whether it is the flu or Corona, is to regulate access and visits to these vulnerable people very strictly.
Principally these are measures that already had been applied to the flu. We say this clearly and concisely in the book. Just stop it.
Why not turn our attention to reasonable, important things? Restore the economy and get the culture back on its feet. Culture has been ruined.
The schools — education has been ruined. We have a relative, this is a personal story now, The had a heart attack.
What is this nonsense? The topic of collateral damage from serious illnesses, heart attacks, badly treated cancer patients, unemployment, mental illness leading to suicide.
Yes, but Mr. Do you understand that? You have… —This is so ridiculous and so crazy and so irresponsible from politicians. As I have said already several times, fortunately the death toll is continuously decreasing.
However, according to some media reports in the past few weeks, there are increasing numbers of long-term consequences for corona patients.
What is your opinion on that from a professional point of view? And no studies. If you want to study long-term effects, you will probably have to do it for a longer time.
You know the document that went viral in March of this year, from the Corona Committee in the German Interior ministry. A protocol was written on how to manage the crisis during a time of crisis.
The consensus was that fear had to be created. The first step in creating fear was by not counting or announcing how many died, because there would be too few.
Professor Bhakdi wrote an open letter to the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, in which he outlined the facts being ignored by the establishment and Branch Covidians.
A lower quality version was backed up to my newly created private video server. If the video is not viewable on this post, click through to Jerm Warfare.
Much higher than other european countries yet similar to China. The actual figures are hard to believe. The peak in the US is also still coming closer.
Like in Britain, wehen they learned when it was too late. Here in Scotland, we have a moderate scenario: in the rural Highlands and Islands, it is very quiet: few if any Covid-related deaths.
In the big cities, it is nasty, but not that different from a bad flu-year. I guess we lost 2, already old and sick people with some indication of Covid: and probably some other folk who were denied basic health care because of the lock down.
The lock-down achieved nothing at all to save a single life, in my view, but it will destroy many young lives through trashing the economy.
Artists, actors, musicians, gig-economy workers: it is a very bad situation. I expect to see more homeless beggars on the streets. You cannot make a claim that it spreads quickly if you do not know when it began spreading.
It could have already been spread. It does seem that the more you look after your own health and immunity the better chance you have of surviving most infections.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. An Open Letter from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi , Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, to the German Chancellor Dr.
Angela Merkel. Professor Bhakdi calls for an urgent reassessment of the response to Covid and asks the Chancellor five crucial questions.
This is an inofficial translation; see the original letter in German as a PDF. As Emeritus of the Johannes-Gutenberg-University in Mainz and longtime director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology, I feel obliged to critically question the far-reaching restrictions on public life that we are currently taking on ourselves in order to reduce the spread of the COVID virus.
It is expressly not my intention to play down the dangers of the virus or to spread a political message.
However, I feel it is my duty to make a scientific contribution to putting the current data and facts into perspective — and, in addition, to ask questions that are in danger of being lost in the heated debate.
The reason for my concern lies above all in the truly unforeseeable socio-economic consequences of the drastic containment measures which are currently being applied in large parts of Europe and which are also already being practiced on a large scale in Germany.
My wish is to discuss critically — and with the necessary foresight — the advantages and disadvantages of restricting public life and the resulting long-term effects.
To this end, I am confronted with five questions which have not been answered sufficiently so far, but which are indispensable for a balanced analysis.
I would like to ask you to comment quickly and, at the same time, appeal to the Federal Government to develop strategies that effectively protect risk groups without restricting public life across the board and sow the seeds for an even more intensive polarization of society than is already taking place.
In infectology — founded by Robert Koch himself — a traditional distinction is made between infection and disease.
An illness requires a clinical manifestation. In other words, a new infection — as measured by the COVID test — does not necessarily mean that we are dealing with a newly ill patient who needs a hospital bed.
However, it is currently assumed that five percent of all infected people become seriously ill and require ventilation.
Projections based on this estimate suggest that the healthcare system could be overburdened. My question : Did the projections make a distinction between symptom-free infected people and actual, sick patients — i.
A number of coronaviruses have been circulating for a long time — largely unnoticed by the media. The internationally recognized International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents will soon publish a paper that addresses exactly this question.
Preliminary results of the study can already be seen today and lead to the conclusion that the new virus is NOT different from traditional corona viruses in terms of threats.Sucharit Bhakdi ist ein deutscher Facharzt für Mikrobiologie und Infektionsepidemiologie. Er war bis zu seinem Ruhestand Professor an der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz und von 19Leiter des dortigen Instituts für Medizinische. Sucharit Bhakdi (thailändisch สุจริต ภักดี [sut̚˨˩.t͡ɕa˨˩.rit̚˨˩ pʰak̚˦˥.diː˧]; * 1. November in Washington, D.C.) ist ein deutscher Facharzt für. Sucharit Bhakdi (born Sucharit Punyaratabandhu, 1 November , in Washington, D.C.) is a retired Thai-German microbiologist. In Bhakdi became a. Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi vom Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU) hat in seinen Arbeiten zur.